header-logo header-logo

Of magic circles & ‘financial remedies courts’

23 September 2022 / David Burrows
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Features , Family , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
94637
David Burrows reflects on the state of family law & considers the chances of alignment of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 with the Civil Procedure Rules 1998
  • Questions our understanding of the ‘magic circle’ of family lawyers.
  • Discusses the single family court and the use of the term ‘financial remedies’.
  • Asks whether the FPR could ever be aligned with the CPR.

This article addresses three questions about the modern state of family law:

(1) What or who is the ‘magic circle’ of family lawyers?

(2) What is the meaning of a ‘financial remedies court’?

(3) In 2022 (and a much more important debate than the other two), what are the realistic chances of alignment of the Family Procedure Rules with the Civil Procedure Rules 1998?

A first thing to assert is that the term ‘financial remedy’ does not exist in statute. It was made up by rule-makers in and approaching April 2011 when the new Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010) came into operation. The terms approved in statute—rules

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll