header-logo header-logo

Number-crunching at the Ministry

06 November 2018
Issue: 7816 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment tribunal fees could be reintroduced but at a lower level, Ministry of Justice (MoJ) permanent secretary Richard Heaton has told MPs.

Giving evidence to the Justice Committee this week, Heaton said it was important to set the fee level so as to be ‘proportionate, progressive and maintain access to justice’, following the Supreme Court’s Unison judgment that fees unlawfully restricted access to justice. Asked to comment on rumours ministers are considering a return to fees, he said he thought fees ‘can work’ as long as they are set at the right level but that there are ‘no immediate plans' and 'we’re still working on it’.

Since Unison, the MoJ has sent 42,000 letters to claimants and paid back £22m.

Heaton said the department has been forced to make ‘tough decisions’ since 2010, when it was asked to cut its budget by 40%. For example, in September it dropped plans for a £66m Transforming Compliance and Enforcement Programme (TCEP) to improve enforcement of court orders and criminal fines because it couldn’t afford to proceed.

Some £18m had been spent on TCEP by the end of August 2018, according to a Freedom of Information request. Committee member Marie Rimmer MP said she understood TCEP had realised £31m by collecting unpaid debt before it was stopped and that, if completed, it would have collected £427m. Asked if this was ‘a wise decision’, Heaton said halting TCEP ‘was not a decision any of us wished to take but it was forced on us by budgetary arithmetic’. He agreed the MoJ baseline budget was ‘unrealistic’.

MoJ chief financial officer Mike Driver said the department had been on course to overspend by £500m unless it took action to save funds. He said the department still lacked ‘realistic and workable plans’ for 2019-20.

Heaton added that the MoJ is actively engaged with the Treasury and is likely to ask for extra money in the spring supplementary estimates because ‘there are challenges to the legal aid fund we would want to rectify’.

The MoJ received an extra £17.4m for Brexit, two-thirds of which has been allocated to staffing costs, including expertise in negotiations on trade and withdrawal.

Issue: 7816 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll