header-logo header-logo

Not so fast

27 January 2011
Issue: 7450 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

If a fast track trial is adjourned on the day before evidence is adduced...

If a fast track trial is adjourned on the day before evidence is adduced and an order for the costs thrown away is made, is the receiving party entitled to the fixed trial fee for counsel? Also, if the claim later settles more than 28 days before the adjourned trial date, is the claimant entitled to the return of the hearing fee?

Assuming counsel is present with their brief, we consider that their client should have the fixed trial costs as or as part of the wasted costs which the paying party is condemned to bear. CPR 46.2 should not be interpreted as meaning that the trial must have taken place for the trial costs to be allowed. We do not consider that the hearing fee is returnable. The trial has been listed and court time lost. An adjournment would not trigger liability for a second hearing (or listing) fee: conversely, a settlement after an abortive hearing for which the court was not blame

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll