header-logo header-logo

Norwich Pharmacal orders: still in vogue?

16 June 2017 / Jonathan Cohen
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
nlj_7750_cohen

Flexible & adaptable to many situations, the Norwich Pharmacal order remains as useful as ever, says Jonathan Cohen

  • Norwich Pharmacal orders for disclosure are granted against third parties innocently caught up in wrongdoing.
  • They have widespread application and have been further developed in case law.

A Norwich Pharmacal order may be an old remedy, but it still has modern application. Its use in the past three years alone demonstrates its continuing flexibility. Norwich Pharmacal orders are court orders to disclose information or documents, granted against third parties who have become mixed up in wrongdoing through no fault of their own. They date back to a 1974 House of Lords case concerning the Norwich Pharmaceutical Company, Norwich Pharmacal v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] 2 All ER 943.

The case

Norwich Pharmacal was the victim of a patent infringement. It knew 30 consignments of the compound, Furazolidone, which was covered by its patent, had been imported into the UK without licence and therefore in breach of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll