header-logo header-logo

15 November 2007
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Non-lawyer to head new legal regulator

News

The inaugural head of the Legal Services Board (LSB) will not be a lawyer.
Members of the legal profession are barred from applying for the £63,000-a-year post, after consumer organisations convinced the government that an internal appointment could lead to conflicts of interest.

Bar Council chairman Geoffrey Vos QC says he would have preferred a situation where the best candidate, lawyer or non-lawyer, was appointed.
However, he accepts that the decision will not damage the operation of the new regulatory structure, provided the person appointed has the “necessary experience and objectivity” to command the respect and confidence of the public and the legal profession.

The part-time appointment, which marks the end of self-regulation of the legal profession, also involves overseeing the creation of the Office for Legal Complaints.

The new recruit will have to ensure that the LSB is seen as fair and transparent and Vos believes that a non-lawyer is ideally placed to ensure that this occurs.

“A distinguished non-lawyer will be able to lead the new board effectively, and ensure that it acts as the light touch oversight regulator that the legislation intends it to be,” he says.

Issue: 7297 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll