header-logo header-logo

09 April 2025
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Whistleblowing , Employment , Human rights
printer mail-detail

No whistleblowing protection for jobseekers

Job applicants are not protected as whistleblowers, the Court of Appeal has confirmed.

Sullivan v Isle of Wight Council [2025] EWCA Civ 379 concerned a job applicant who made allegations about a charitable trust, a trustee of which was on the council’s interviewing panel.

Currently, the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA) only provides whistleblowing protection to NHS job applicants. Sullivan contended this was incompatible with her human rights, among other grounds. The court dismissed her appeal.

However, Lord Justice Lewis, giving the main judgment, said he would regard applying for a job ‘as capable of being treatment on the ground of some other status’.

Anna Birtwistle, partner at Farrer & Co, representing intervener Protect, the whistleblowing charity, said: ‘The judgment is particularly important in noting that a job applicant is capable of falling under “some other status” under Article 14 [of the European Convention on Human Rights] … and it clearly outlines the purpose of whistleblowing provisions in the ERA to protect the public interest.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll