header-logo header-logo

No smoking for inmates

09 March 2015
Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Prisoners do not have a human right to smoke and the public ban on smoking in enclosed public spaces applies to state prisons, the High Court has held.

Although the case concerns prisons, the main issue of law applies to all government buildings.  

In Black v Secretary of State for Justice [2015] EWHC 528 (Admin), Mr Justice Singh ruled in favour of Paul Black, an inmate of HMP Wymott, a non-smoker with health problems who was concerned about the effect of second-hand smoke.

The case centred on whether Part 1 of the Health Act 2006, which bans smoking in enclosed public spaces and workplaces, applied to state prisons under the authority of the Crown. 

The Secretary of State argued that the Health Act 2006, so far as material, does not apply to any government buildings or spaces, on the ground that the relevant part of the Act does not bind the Crown.

Prison policy is that inmates are permitted to smoke in their own cells but not in common areas. Similarly, staff are not permitted to smoke in common areas.

Mr Singh held that the 2006 Act applies to all public places and workplaces which fall within its scope, including those for which the Crown is responsible, therefore both state and private sector prisons are bound by it.

However, he rejected the claimant’s arguments that his human rights had been breached and that there had been a breach of the Prison Rules 1999.
Mr Singh stayed his order pending any appeal.

A Ministry of Justice (MoJ) spokesperson said: “As this is an ongoing legal matter it would not be appropriate to comment further.”

 

Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll