header-logo header-logo

10 November 2017 / Nicholas Griffin KC
Issue: 7769 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Bribery , Profession , Commercial
printer mail-detail

No safe havens? Pt 1

nlj_7769_griffin

Corporate facilitation of tax evasion: the new frontier. A special two-part analysis by QEB Hollis Whiteman Chambers

  • The Criminal Finances Act 2017 includes new corporate criminal offences of failing to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion, which came into force at the end of September.
  • These are strict liability offences coupled with reverse burden ‘reasonable prevention procedures’ defences, akin to the Bribery Act 2010. They have far-reaching implications.

There is no doubt that the recent years of austerity have naturally triggered debate surrounding the adequacy of the Government’s tax enforcement methods. In tandem, the HSBC Switzerland ‘secret accounts’, the ‘Panama papers’ scandals have highlighted significant holes in the current regulatory and criminal enforcement regimes. It is no coincidence that the events in 2015 and 2016 were immediately followed by Government consultations on better tackling tax avoidance and evasion alike. This month’s striking publication of the ‘Paradise papers’ has raised similar concerns.

Following these consultations, the Government has sought to strengthen the legislative tools at its disposal to tackle

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll