header-logo header-logo

No safe haven?

28 March 2019 / Ruth Mullen
Issue: 7834 / Categories: Features , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Ruth Mullen reports on a lacklustre response to the plight of migrant women who suffer domestic violence—the draft Domestic Abuse Bill

Legislation introduced in 2002 acknowledged that migrant women often face a stark choice between staying in an abusive relationship or being deported. To date, only migrant women who are in the UK with Limited Leave on the partner route are eligible to apply for indefinite leave to remain.

If they can show that they are destitute, then the exorbitant Home Office fee of more than £2,000 will be waived. If they meet the means tested requirements for legal aid, they will be entitled to free legal representation. If not, however, they will be subject to private legal fees ranging into the thousands and that does not include the Home Office fee.

Expanding definitions

The draft Domestic Abuse Bill promises new protections with the statutory definition of abuse being extended to include the subtle forms of coercive and controlling abuse that many victims experience. It also acknowledges that abuse is not limited to couples.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll