header-logo header-logo

No to sacking slackers

03 November 2011
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers express dismay at unfair dismissal law plans

Employment lawyers have given short shrift to leaked proposals to scrap unfair dismissal laws.

A report by venture capitalist Adrian Beecroft for Downing Street, leaked to the press last week, proposes replacing unfair dismissal with “compensated no fault dismissal”. Employers would be allowed to sack staff with basic redundancy pay and notice. Beecroft concedes that employers could sack staff because they don’t like them, but this is “a price worth paying”.

However, lawyers warn that this could create a rise in discrimination claims, which have no limit on the amount of compensation claimed.

Bronwyn McKenna, chair of the Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) legislative and policy committee, says: “If the proposals outlined in Beecroft’s leaked report on unfair dismissal were to be adopted, that would arguably lead to a two-tier system of protection in the workplace, ie legal safeguards will apply to employees with a protected characteristic under the Equality Act and not to those who aren’t so covered.”

On whether the UK could lawfully introduce such a proposal, McKenna said unfair dismissal is “a creation of English statute”, therefore there “may not be an insuperable EU hurdle. There may be questions about the UK’s compliance under its international law obligations”.

Linda Farrell, employment partner at Bristows, says: “Until we see more flesh on the proposal, it is difficult to see how it could work. If an employer says to an employee that they are ‘not up to scratch and should think of hanging up their boots’ it would drive a coach and horses through our age discrimination laws if such a comment could never be raised in an employment tribunal.”

Issue: 7488 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll