header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007 / Tracey Elliott
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Features , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

No need for the fat police

Parents should not be criminalised for having fat children, says Tracey Elliott

Kelly Banham, in her article, “Is the law a fat ass?” (NLJ, 23 Febru­ary 2007, p 269) suggests that the government should consider “prosecuting parents for child cruelty in allowing their children to become obese for reasons other than a diagnosed medical condition”. She compares the government’s current approach to child obesity with the law’s approach towards animal cruelty and suggests that the criminal law offers more protection to animals than it does to children.

Certainly the case involving the Benton brothers and Rusty, the fat labrador, marks the first conviction of pet owners for the offence of causing unnecessary suffering by allowing their animals to become obese (Protection of Animals Act 1911 (PAA 1911), s 1(1)(a) as amended by the Protection of Animals (Amendment) Act 2000). It remains to be seen if the RSPCA will start routinely prosecuting pet owners for permitting their animals to become obese. If it does, there will be a large number of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll