header-logo header-logo

No more pat-downs in Stratford

05 June 2024
Issue: 8074 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Controversial ‘enhanced’ searches at Stratford Magistrates’ Court have been dropped, following complaints about heavy-handed security

In May, a duty solicitor was pinned to the ground by security officers, prompting the London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) to call for the officers to be suspended. Solicitors have also complained of ‘invasive’ body searches.

LCCSA said it received a letter last week from HM Courts and Tribunal Service, confirming visitors with Professional User Access Scheme (PUAS) cards will not be subject to ‘enhanced’ searches, from 28 May.

‘This means that PUAS members should no longer be subjected to pat-down searches and required to remove their shoes,’ LCCSA’s committee confirmed.

Issue: 8074 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll