header-logo header-logo

21 March 2014
Issue: 7600 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

No maternity rights for surrogacy (yet)

CJEU rules on conflicting opinions by Advocates General

A mother who has had a baby through a surrogate is not entitled under EU law to maternity leave or its equivalent, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) has held.

Within an hour of the birth, the mother was caring for and breastfeeding the baby. A parental order was granted, but she was denied maternity leave by her employer.

The unequivocal ruling, in CD v ST (Case C 167/12), clears up confusion caused by two conflicting opinions given by Advocates General. 

Last year, Advocate General Kokott advised that the mother was entitled to 14 weeks’ paid maternity leave under the Pregnant Workers’ Directive, but that the maternity leave should be shared with the woman who gave birth.

On the same day, in a separate case, Advocate General Wahl advised that the 14 weeks maternity leave is intended to protect a woman’s biological condition after giving birth, in Z v A Government Department and the Board of Management of a Community School (Case C 363/12).

Naeema Choudry, partner at Eversheds, says: “The issue of maternity rights for surrogate parents caused confusion last year when two Advocates General gave conflicting opinions on the same day, highlighting the complexity of EU discrimination law in this area.

“That confusion has been dispelled by a final ruling from the CJEU, though the case carries less significance for UK employers now, as the Children and Families Act 2014 will extend the right to paid leave to people who become parents through surrogacy. Although the approach may appear, on its face, not to advance the rights of mothers through surrogacy, it could be seen as refusing to perpetuate a traditional distribution of the roles of men and women.

“This approach seems to be in line with other recent CJEU decisions, in particular the decision in the case of Roca Alvarez (C-104/09), which appeared to recognise that confining certain rights to mothers may, in practice, disadvantage both men and women.”

The CJEU also dismissed the argument that an inability to have a child amounts to a “disability” under EU discrimination legislation.

From April 2015, intended surrogate parents will qualify for adoption leave, under the 2014 Act.

Issue: 7600 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll