header-logo header-logo

No maternity rights for surrogacy (yet)

21 March 2014
Issue: 7600 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

CJEU rules on conflicting opinions by Advocates General

A mother who has had a baby through a surrogate is not entitled under EU law to maternity leave or its equivalent, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) has held.

Within an hour of the birth, the mother was caring for and breastfeeding the baby. A parental order was granted, but she was denied maternity leave by her employer.

The unequivocal ruling, in CD v ST (Case C 167/12), clears up confusion caused by two conflicting opinions given by Advocates General. 

Last year, Advocate General Kokott advised that the mother was entitled to 14 weeks’ paid maternity leave under the Pregnant Workers’ Directive, but that the maternity leave should be shared with the woman who gave birth.

On the same day, in a separate case, Advocate General Wahl advised that the 14 weeks maternity leave is intended to protect a woman’s biological condition after giving birth, in Z v A Government Department and the Board of Management of a Community School (Case C 363/12).

Naeema Choudry, partner at Eversheds, says: “The issue of maternity rights for surrogate parents caused confusion last year when two Advocates General gave conflicting opinions on the same day, highlighting the complexity of EU discrimination law in this area.

“That confusion has been dispelled by a final ruling from the CJEU, though the case carries less significance for UK employers now, as the Children and Families Act 2014 will extend the right to paid leave to people who become parents through surrogacy. Although the approach may appear, on its face, not to advance the rights of mothers through surrogacy, it could be seen as refusing to perpetuate a traditional distribution of the roles of men and women.

“This approach seems to be in line with other recent CJEU decisions, in particular the decision in the case of Roca Alvarez (C-104/09), which appeared to recognise that confining certain rights to mothers may, in practice, disadvantage both men and women.”

The CJEU also dismissed the argument that an inability to have a child amounts to a “disability” under EU discrimination legislation.

From April 2015, intended surrogate parents will qualify for adoption leave, under the 2014 Act.

Issue: 7600 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll