header-logo header-logo

03 February 2011 / Henry Marshall
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

No love lost?

Henry Marshall presents ”The Edge of Love”, starring Capitol Films & the Insolvency Act 1986

The High Court has ruled that the joint administrators of Capitol Films Limited must bear significant legal costs personally, after their application for permission to sell assets of the stricken film producer and distributor was dismissed (Re Capitol Films Ltd (in administration) [2010] EWHC 3223 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 175 (Dec)).

The case provides an interesting contrast to recent cases in which challenges to the conduct of an administrator have failed, such as Four Private Investment Funds v Lomas and Others [2008] EWHC 2869 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 237 (Nov) (in which an application under para 74 of Sch B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986 challenging the administrator’s failure to provide the information sought by creditors failed) and BLV Realty Organization Limited v the Joint Administrators of Zegna III Holdings Inc [2009] EWHC 2994 (Ch) (in which the court declined to intervene with the administrators’ commercial judgment to terminate a contract). The above cases illustrate that in practice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll