header-logo header-logo

No limits on fines a “game changer”

19 March 2015
Issue: 7645 / Categories: Legal News , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Magistrates have been given powers to impose unlimited fines across the board in a move which may take many by surprise. The implementation of s 85 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 means magistrates can now impose unlimited fines.

Previously, fines in the magistrates’ courts were capped at £20,000 per charge. Under s 85(1) the limit is removed on certain fines on conviction by a magistrates’ court “where, on the commencement day [12 March], a relevant offence would, apart from this subsection, be punishable on summary
conviction by a fine or maximum fine of £5,000 or more (however expressed), the offence is punishable on summary conviction on or after that day
by a fine of any amount”. 

Gerard Forlin QC, of Cornerstone Barristers, says: “It’s a game changer. Only the future will inform us, but it will be extremely interesting to see how many cases will now remain in the lower courts and not be sent up to the Crown Court.

"These cases will include regulatory offences such as health and safety and environmental cases. Further, this change to sentencing powers was also highlighted in the recent Sentencing Council document relating to health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences guidelines."

 

Issue: 7645 / Categories: Legal News , Health & safety
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll