header-logo header-logo

14 December 2012 / Danny Mcfadden
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR
printer mail-detail

No hidden dragon

Danny McFadden on the increasing popularity of mediation in Hong Kong

A recent global survey of general counsel has found that nearly half of respondents believe that mediation will grow significantly ahead of litigation in the Asia Pacific region, with Hong Kong uniquely placed at the forefront of that trend.

Possibly not surprising given that, in June 2012, Hong Kong enshrined mediation’s status in law—the Mediation Ordinance—meaning that in Hong Kong, mediation is regulated by statute. This marks a departure from mediation practice in many other jurisdictions, where regulation is less formal and remains within the scope of the industry, rather than drawing on the instruments of government. The Mediation Ordinance formalises aspects of the process, such as the confidentiality of mediation communications, but also seems to fulfil a “signalling” process. The ordinance speaks to international disputants, offering reassurance that Hong Kong offers a fair and open theatre to those seeking mediation there.

There are three main reasons why the use of mediation has grown so enthusiastically in Hong Kong;

  • It is part of
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll