header-logo header-logo

No guarantees for landlords

03 August 2011
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lease guarantees left worthless by K/S Victoria Street case ruling

Commercial property landlords have been left high and dry after a significant Court of Appeal judgment on lease guarantees.

In K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser [2011] EWCA Civ 904, the court held that many guarantees are worthless, falling foul of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995, s 25.

LexisPSL property solicitor Malcolm Dowden said: “There will be a lot of firms redrafting their precedent leases, and a lot of landlords looking with concern at guarantees that are now confirmed to be void. Lawyers who have given a clean bill of financial health to an investment purchase assuming the validity of guarantees may now have to reconsider that advice.”

According to Dowden, the ruling means that “even if freely given and fully intended to be legally binding, a guarantee given by the outgoing tenant’s guarantor in respect of the immediate assignee is void”.

He explained that the 1995 Act was “a hasty response to the perceived injustice of tenants remaining liable for premises long after they had parted with them. Parliament’s answer was to provide an automatic release from liability when the tenant of a lease granted on or after
1 January 1996 assigns it to a new tenant”.

Landlords argued that investment values would be slashed as a result, and their lobbying led to the creation of “authorised guarantee agreements” (AGAs). As a condition of giving its consent to an assignment, a landlord may require the outgoing tenant to guarantee performance by its assignee.

Dowden says: “Since 1996 landlords’ solicitors have tried a range of drafting approaches to work around the limitations of the 1995 Act.

“Only one of those approaches—requiring the guarantor to join in or to stand behind the tenant’s obligations in the AGA—survives the Court of Appeal ruling. Other perfectly rational approaches have been struck down—including the approach initially devised by Clifford Chance under which the outgoing tenant was required to assign first to its guarantor. The guarantor would become ‘tenant’ for a moment before passing the lease on to the actual assignee. Having been tenant for a moment, the guarantor could give an AGA.”

He said landlords may now be deterred from consenting to lease assignments where the covenant strength of the assignee is unproven, “increasing the risk of high street shop units and other commercial properties remaining empty and unused”.

Issue: 7477 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll