header-logo header-logo

No family law funds

12 January 2012
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Family law clients to be hit heavily by legal aid cuts

The proposed cuts to family law legal aid would remove public funding from more than 75% of family law clients, a survey by family lawyers’ association Resolution has shown.

The survey, completed by 267 family lawyers who do legal aid work, suggested the loss of funding would affect parents who risked losing contact with their children, increase the numbers left to survive on benefits, and put extra pressure on the courts.

Some 57% of respondents said at least half their cases involved a parent who risked losing contact with their children—affecting more than 4,000 children.

David Allison, chairman of Resolution, says the proposed cuts could have “devastating consequences”.

“The changes also risk increasing the nation’s benefits bill,” he says. “Many of our members say that the majority of their clients would not know what financial settlement they are entitled to, which could see them left dependent on the welfare state and benefits.”

Some 42% of respondents said appropriate legal advice meant that at least half their cases settled without going to court. All respondents agreed that cases take longer when one party is representing themselves.

Over 40% of current legal aid cases have been assessed as unsuitable for mediation.
 

Issue: 7496 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll