header-logo header-logo

No family law funds

12 January 2012
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Family law clients to be hit heavily by legal aid cuts

The proposed cuts to family law legal aid would remove public funding from more than 75% of family law clients, a survey by family lawyers’ association Resolution has shown.

The survey, completed by 267 family lawyers who do legal aid work, suggested the loss of funding would affect parents who risked losing contact with their children, increase the numbers left to survive on benefits, and put extra pressure on the courts.

Some 57% of respondents said at least half their cases involved a parent who risked losing contact with their children—affecting more than 4,000 children.

David Allison, chairman of Resolution, says the proposed cuts could have “devastating consequences”.

“The changes also risk increasing the nation’s benefits bill,” he says. “Many of our members say that the majority of their clients would not know what financial settlement they are entitled to, which could see them left dependent on the welfare state and benefits.”

Some 42% of respondents said appropriate legal advice meant that at least half their cases settled without going to court. All respondents agreed that cases take longer when one party is representing themselves.

Over 40% of current legal aid cases have been assessed as unsuitable for mediation.
 

Issue: 7496 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll