header-logo header-logo

01 March 2019
Issue: 7831 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Criminal
printer mail-detail

No deal: a good deal for criminals?

Criminal justice co-operation will ‘immediately cease’ following a no-deal Brexit

A no-deal Brexit could make the UK a ‘safe haven’ for international criminals due to relaxed safeguards, solicitors have warned.

The UK currently co-operates with the other 27 EU countries to catch and prosecute criminals and terrorists, sharing data and investigations. Once the UK leaves, however, unless a deal governing criminal justice terrorism is in place, the many agreements facilitating this co-operation will cease to apply.

Law Society president Christina Blacklaws said this week that no deal would make it ‘harder to investigate cross-border crime, harder to arrest suspects and remove them to face justice, harder to get compensation for victims.

‘At the moment of departure, when it comes to criminal justice, all manner of issues will be left unresolved and solicitors will have to pick their way through 27 different justice systems instead of just one – the EU’s’.

The UK will no longer, for example, be able to use the European Arrest Warrant (EAW), which speeds up requests by one member state to another for the surrender of accused or convicted people; the European Investigation Order (EIO), which facilitates the gathering of evidence in another member state of the EU; Europol, which supports member states’ responses to cross-border crime; and EU judicial co-operation unit (Eurojust), which co-ordinates investigation and prosecution of cross border crime.

Blacklaws said: ‘If we leave the EU without a deal, the era of unprecedented international security and criminal justice co-operation which we’ve enjoyed as a member state will immediately cease.

‘Under the EAW criminals can easily be repatriated to their home state, but if the UK exits without a deal we may end up relying on a treaty from the 1950s. The British people may not be forgiving if the UK becomes a safe haven for criminals from across the EU27.’

The 1957 European Extradition Convention process, which Switzerland still sometimes uses, is ‘lengthy, costly and taxpayers will end up footing the bill’, she said.

The Law Society published a guidance paper for solicitors this week, ‘No-deal Brexit criminal justice co-operation’.

Issue: 7831 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll