header-logo header-logo

No to ad incentives for CMCs

15 August 2012
Issue: 7527 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Djangoly: “complete ban on inducement advertising”

Claims management companies (CMCs) are to be banned from offering cash incentives to people who use their services.

Ministry of Justice minister Jonathan Djanogly has also announced a “complete ban on inducement advertising”.

He said regulatory action against CMCs had been stepped up over the last 12 months and a number were being “watched closely” by the regulatory body, the Claims Management Regulation (CMR) Unit.

The unit’s annual report for 2011–12, published last month, shows that more than 400 CMCs were suspended or warned in the last year. Of these, 260 were shut down.

Djanogly said: “This is a significant number and proves just how much work is going on to clamp down on CMCs that flout the rules and prey on consumers with over-zealous business tactics.

“The key focus of the CMR unit is to improve consumer protection by driving malpractice out of the claims management industry. We also want to see tougher rules enforced on CMCs and that’s why I am pleased to announce we are now introducing a complete ban on inducement advertising for this industry.

“No longer will CMCs be able to target consumers through advertisements which offer vulnerable individuals a cash incentive for signing up to use their services.”

Ministry of Justice head of claims management regulation Kevin Rousell says the mis-selling of payment protection insurance (PPI) led to a surge in the number of CMCs operating in the financial claims management sector.

“Poor practice is rife among some CMCs, who are falling over each other to get claimants’ business. To help tackle this we have set up a specialist team to root out the poor practices used by some companies presenting claims for mis-sold PPI.”

Rousell says the aim of the unit is not to stop CMCs trading but to make sure they operate responsibly.

“Flooding defendants, particularly lenders, with many thousands of poorly prepared claims is unacceptable and clogs up an already overloaded system, which can be of detriment to consumers with valid claims, as well as causing unnecessary additional processing costs.”

Issue: 7527 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll