header-logo header-logo

15 August 2012
Issue: 7527 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

No to ad incentives for CMCs

Djangoly: “complete ban on inducement advertising”

Claims management companies (CMCs) are to be banned from offering cash incentives to people who use their services.

Ministry of Justice minister Jonathan Djanogly has also announced a “complete ban on inducement advertising”.

He said regulatory action against CMCs had been stepped up over the last 12 months and a number were being “watched closely” by the regulatory body, the Claims Management Regulation (CMR) Unit.

The unit’s annual report for 2011–12, published last month, shows that more than 400 CMCs were suspended or warned in the last year. Of these, 260 were shut down.

Djanogly said: “This is a significant number and proves just how much work is going on to clamp down on CMCs that flout the rules and prey on consumers with over-zealous business tactics.

“The key focus of the CMR unit is to improve consumer protection by driving malpractice out of the claims management industry. We also want to see tougher rules enforced on CMCs and that’s why I am pleased to announce we are now introducing a complete ban on inducement advertising for this industry.

“No longer will CMCs be able to target consumers through advertisements which offer vulnerable individuals a cash incentive for signing up to use their services.”

Ministry of Justice head of claims management regulation Kevin Rousell says the mis-selling of payment protection insurance (PPI) led to a surge in the number of CMCs operating in the financial claims management sector.

“Poor practice is rife among some CMCs, who are falling over each other to get claimants’ business. To help tackle this we have set up a specialist team to root out the poor practices used by some companies presenting claims for mis-sold PPI.”

Rousell says the aim of the unit is not to stop CMCs trading but to make sure they operate responsibly.

“Flooding defendants, particularly lenders, with many thousands of poorly prepared claims is unacceptable and clogs up an already overloaded system, which can be of detriment to consumers with valid claims, as well as causing unnecessary additional processing costs.”

Issue: 7527 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Taylor Rose—Jessica Draganescu & Emily Hewlett

Taylor Rose—Jessica Draganescu & Emily Hewlett

Firm strengthens growth strategy and group litigation capability with senior hires

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll