header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: What's in a name?

16 July 2021
Issue: 7941 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality , Human rights
printer mail-detail
52819
Rebranding the past―when historical ideals fall short of modern values

Hardwicke Chambers is changing its name due to the problematic decisions of the eighteenth-century Attorney General after which it is named.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, John Gould, senior partner, Russell-Cooke, looks into the reasons for the name-change―the Earl of Hardwicke’s decision that enslaved people should legally be considered the property of their ‘owners’ even if they set foot on English soil or were baptised.

Hardwicke Chambers will henceforth be known as Gatehouse Chambers.

Issue: 7941 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality , Human rights
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll