header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Tracing the impact of Uber through significant cases

22 July 2022
Issue: 7988 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail
88169

One year on from the Supreme Court’s landmark ‘Uber’ decision, Charles Pigott examines its effect on employment law, in this week’s NLJ

Pigott, professional support lawyer, Mills & Reeve, traces its impact through four significant rulings from the Court of Appeal plus a number of Employment Appeal Tribunal cases since the judgment.

Uber v Aslam was a seminal case that looked at the status of workers in the so-called ‘gig economy’. Pigott writes: ‘There will always be a degree of unpredictability about employment status disputes. As the Uber decision itself emphasises, tribunals are charged with conducting a close examination of how the relationship operates in practice, on the understanding that every case is unique.’

He concludes that, one-year post-Uber, a clearer picture of the working relationship and worker status has emerged.

Issue: 7988 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll