header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: The rise of shareholder activism & the ‘shaky’ shareholder principle

12 January 2024
Issue: 8054 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-detail
152799
The basis of the shareholder principle is ‘shaky’, according to the recent High Court case of Various claimants v G4S

In this week’s NLJ, Lois Horne, disputes partner at Mcfarlanes and a London Solicitor Litigation Association (LSLA) Committee Member, takes a detailed look at the G4S judgment. She explains the practical importance of the principle, given the rise of shareholder activism and shareholder claims, and why there are doubts about its basis and scope.

The shareholder principle, as Horne explains, is ‘the principle that a company cannot assert privilege against its shareholders, except where the documents came into existence in contemplation of proceedings between the company and its shareholders’.

Horne notes the judge in G4S ‘was clearly struck by the absence of detailed consideration of the shareholder principle in previous cases’. However, some may also argue the principle is long-established. Horne highlights that practical difficulties may result and that the current rules are ‘problematic’.

Issue: 8054 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll