header-logo header-logo

19 July 2024
Issue: 8080 / Categories: Legal News , Tort , Personal injury , Damages
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: The reign in Spain when Brits complain

182210

As thoughts turn to holidays, bear in mind the Court of Appeal decision in Nicholls v Mapfre

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Andrew Young, 3 Hare Court, analyses the outcome and reasoning in this case, which concerned a scooter accident and other torts in Spain followed by claims brought in England against Spanish insurance company Mapfre.

The question before the court was that of interest—under which jurisdictional regime was the applicable interest rate? Was it the higher rate stipulated by Spanish law, or the lower rate in England. The answer depended on whether the award of interest was substantive or procedural.  

Young writes: ‘The effect of making an award of interest in accordance with the provisions of Spanish Act 50/1980 had been almost to double the overall value of the claims in those two cases in which the figures were disclosed.’ 

Issue: 8080 / Categories: Legal News , Tort , Personal injury , Damages
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll