header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Spotlight on (virtual) ADR

17 June 2020
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , ADR , Mediation , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
The impact on international arbitration of the COVID-19 pandemic is among topics explored in a series of articles in NLJ’s ADR special this week

Barrister and mediator, Professor Suzanne Rab, Serle Court, says ‘digitisation presents new opportunities’ and points out that mediators and advisors will need to adapt. She offers practical advice and highlights that virtual mediation could help ‘mitigate the impact’ of the pandemic on business as well as providing new career pathways for lawyers.   

International arbitration was better prepared than the court system because it already used remote hearings in one form or another, writes barrister Anthony Connerty, 6 Pump Court.

Arbitral organisations moved swiftly to provide webinars and take steps to address any issues arising in virtual proceedings, for example, the slower pace and the danger of witnesses being assisted off camera.

Masood Ahmed, Associate Professor at Leicester University and member of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee, provides a detailed look at the significance of ADR and the dangers of unreasonable behaviour. He surveys relevant caselaw, for example, on silence in the face of an invitation to ADR and unreasonable refusal to engage in ADR.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll