header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Riders not workers, workers not partners, affirmation not waiver

08 December 2023
Issue: 8052 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail
Employment law brief looks at the Deliveroo case, partnership versus employment and loss of the right to claim constructive dismissal, in this week’s NLJ

Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at the Norwich Law School, UEA, ends the year with a triple helping of employment precedent.

First up, can Deliveroo riders form a trade union? That depends if they are ‘workers’. Smith dissects the case and looks at relevant similar cases. Second, what rights pertain where a company such as Anglian Windows forms a contract with a two-person partnership? Is it a sham for employment? Third, in a reversal of the usual state of affairs, what happens when an employee faced with a breach of contract by the employer affirms the contract? Do they lose the right to claim constructive dismissal? 

Issue: 8052 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll