header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Rethinking ethics

10 June 2020
Issue: 7890 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Current pandemic and financial woes make this a good time to rethink our approach to professional ethics, Russell-Cooke senior partner John Gould writes in this week’s NLJ

Gould asks: are current sanctions too harsh, and should firms share the responsibility for individual misconduct? He highlights recent controversy over the newly-qualified Capsticks solicitor struck off after losing a briefcase, panicking and trying to cover up her mistake.

‘Sometimes individual justice must give way to the public interest in deterrence,’ he writes.

‘Deterrence is, however, better served by the probability of detection than exemplary punishment for a very few. Would a solicitor be significantly less likely to risk an untruth to a colleague if the risk was, say, only suspension or some other published and painful sanction rather than the end of a career?’

@RussellCooke @newlawjournal

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll