header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Reshaping climate justice

21 June 2024
Issue: 8076 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Climate change litigation , EU , Human rights
printer mail-detail
177928

The KlimaSeniorinnen case is a landmark judgment in terms of climate litigation by the European Court of Human Rights

In this week’s NLJ, David Lawne, partner, Luke Grimes, senior associate, and Ginevra Bicciolo, associate, Hausfeld, write that the case ‘firmly establishes the principle that inaction by states on climate change may constitute a breach of human rights’.

Lawne, Grimes and Bicciolo take an in-depth look at the case and why it succeeded. They assess its implications for future litigation, both in the UK and in Convention contracting states abroad.

The authors note it sets a high bar for individual applicants and a low bar for associations seeking to bring climate change cases. They write: ‘In doing so it recognised that associations play a crucial role in representing those most affected by climate change, such as future generations who cannot speak for themselves.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll