header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Recent developments in causation & the ‘but for’ test

28 June 2024
Issue: 8077 / Categories: Legal News , Judicial line , Tort
printer mail-detail
179410

The ‘but for’ test is a simple and elegant guide to assessing liability in tort, but complications can and do arise

In this week’s NLJ, Ian Gascoigne, a member of the dispute resolution team at LexisNexis and a former City litigation partner, investigates how the test has shaped up in recent years.

Gascoigne highlights some problematic issues that can arise. What, for example, if several cars are involved in an accident? He writes that ‘English law will sometimes take a pragmatic view’ when confronted with difficulties, and highlights recent case law and judicial comment on the application of the test.

Issue: 8077 / Categories: Legal News , Judicial line , Tort
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll