header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Probate—how creative practitioners can avoid it

31 March 2023
Issue: 8019 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , Profession
printer mail-detail
117260
The process of obtaining probate can be a headache and a cause for despair, but what if there were an alternative? 

Ann Stanyer, partner at Wedlake Bell, writing in this week’s NLJ, suggests it may be ‘time to rethink’ whether a grant of representation is necessary and whether, instead, clients’ affairs could be structured in a way to avoid the probate process.

Stanyer sets out alternatives—for example, most high street banks are prepared to release up to £50,000 or more in some circumstances, without a grant of representation. She also looks at trusts and transfers of estate for high net worth individuals.

Stanyer concludes that while, the need for the grant will continue for complex estates, ‘practitioners need to be more creative in advising clients about how to avoid the need for a grant of representation for a straightforward estate’. 

Read more about the alternative options here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll