header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Greta & the frequently changing rules of policing protest

12 April 2024
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Public , In Court
printer mail-detail
167824

In this week’s NLJ, Neil Parpworth, of Leicester De Montfort Law School, looks at the Greta Thunberg case, and her subsequent acquittal, through the lens of public order legislation

Swedish activist Thunberg recently pleaded not guilty to a public order offence in connection with a protest outside an oil industry conference at a hotel on London’s Park Lane.

Parpworth uses Thunberg’s case to explain, and assess the impact of, recent changes to policing powers and the right to peaceful assembly. Who defines what amounts to ‘serious disruption to the life of the community’, and are the courts being sufficiently robust with regard to decisions by the police?

The author writes: ‘A protestor must know exactly what it is they must do, or refrain from doing, for it to be fair and just for them to be penalised for breaching a condition.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Ceri Morgan analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Johnson v FirstRand Bank
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
In this month's update, employment guru Ian Smith reveals the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s pivotal role in the ongoing supermarket equal pay litigation, upholding most findings and confirming that detailed training materials are valid evidence of actual work
County court cases are speeding up, with the median time from claim to hearing 62 weeks for fast, intermediate and multi-track claims—5.4 weeks faster than last year
back-to-top-scroll