header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Divorces rising under lockdown

19 November 2020
Issue: 7911 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail
32310
The stresses and strains of lockdown appear to have provoked a surge in couples wanting to separate, Linda Lamb, solicitor and director of LSL Family Law, writes in NLJ this week
The increase occurs at a time when the―’already creaking’―family court is under incredible pressure due to the COVID-19 pandemic. While many clients want to go straight to the court, this is ‘the worst possible option’, Lamb writes.

In fact, a ‘long and strung out’ divorce process during the pandemic is ‘very likely to have damaging effects on the divorcing couple’s wellbeing’.

Lamb looks at the options and initiatives open to couples, noting ‘mediation and arbitration…are a family lawyer’s bread and butter in divorce cases’.

Issue: 7911 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Family , Divorce
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll