header-logo header-logo

28 June 2024
Issue: 8077 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Mental health , Pro Bono , Charities
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Charitable thanks but no thanks? Pro bono matters & healthy habits at work

179399

NLJ’s charity law special presents a trio of thought-provoking articles in this week’s issue

First up, when can charities lawfully refuse or return donations (where, for example, acceptance could result in reputational harm)? Neasa Coen, partner at Payne Hicks Beach, covers Charity Commission guidance and case law on this fascinating and topical issue.

Coen writes that high-value artistic works have been returned and substantial donations refused, for example, Save the Children refused £750,000 from Neptune Energy.

Next, Bryony Wells, director of development at Advocate, and Jessica Duxbury, associate, pro bono, Simmons & Simmons, set out the many pros and pluses of pro bono work. They write that pro bono not only makes a huge difference to the lives of clients but also benefits the lawyers, firms and chambers that do the work. Examples given include that it can ‘deepen relationship with commercial clients’ and can be used ‘to support applications to panels’.

Completing the trio, Elizabeth Rimmer, chief executive of LawCare, the mental health charity for the legal sector, offers practical tips on establishing healthy habits in the workplace. Rimmer writes: ‘Establishing these early on can help build your resilience and enable you to flourish in your legal career.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll