header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Changes to the rules for protected beneficiaries

31 March 2023
Issue: 8019 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Court of Protection , Mental health , Family , CPR
printer mail-detail
117281
Court of Protection and trust lawyers who assist in personal injury and clinical negligence cases will be impacted by proposed amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules. 

In this week’s NLJ, Court of Protection partner Gareth Williams, of Price Slater Gawne, looks at the changes that are coming down the line and sets out how they will affect the landscape.

The changes come into play where money recovered for a protected beneficiary exceeds £100,000. Williams looks at how the amendments might work in practice, noting they are ‘likely to delay the process, making it vitally important for litigation friends to get their proverbial “ducks in a row” well in advance of any approval hearing’. 

Read more about the changing landscape here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll