header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

NLJ this week: SLAPPed shut?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
05 September 2025
Issue: 8129 / Categories: Legal News , Defamation , Dispute resolution , Fraud , Human rights
printer mail-detail
228911
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics

England and Wales is a popular forum due to claimant-friendly defamation laws and the ‘loser pays’ rule. Whittam highlights the psychological toll on defendants and the difficulty of early dismissal under current procedural rules.

lthough new anti-SLAPP provisions came into force in June 2025, they only apply to economic crime, leaving many abusive claims unchecked. Whittam calls for broader reform to protect public interest speech and prevent litigation from becoming a tool of censorship. Without stronger safeguards, free expression remains vulnerable to legal bullying.

Issue: 8129 / Categories: Legal News , Defamation , Dispute resolution , Fraud , Human rights
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES
 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Read All
Conveyancers celebrate U-turn over mortgage handbook fee
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
Are you suited to a career in prosecution?
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
LSB marks Mazur homework
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
NLJ this week: Stuck in the past?
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
NLJ this week: No automatic bar on ‘user damages’
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll