header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: PR professionals playing important role in litigation

20 June 2025
Issue: 8121 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Dispute resolution , Public , Media
printer mail-detail
223023
High stakes litigation requires careful media management, writes James Lynch, partner, Maltin PR, in this week’s NLJ

Lynch explains why ‘legal teams are now expected to factor reputational considerations into case strategy from the outset’, and increasingly work alongside litigation public relations professionals to develop communication plans, brief journalists, correct misinformation and ensure consistency of approach.

For corporates and high-profile individuals, litigation means ‘reputational exposure, often on a global scale’ as well as legal risk. Group action litigation can be particularly risky as they ‘are by their very nature a David v Goliath story’ and therefore simple for journalists to frame in a way that casts the company in a bad light. 
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll