header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: No duty to warn—even when danger is clear

18 July 2025
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Legal News , Tort , Criminal
printer mail-detail
225839
Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group examines the Court of Appeal’s ruling in Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock, where police were found not liable for failing to warn a domestic abuse victim of an imminent attack

Despite a neighbour’s 999 call reporting the assailant lurking outside, no warning was given—and minutes later, the victim was stabbed. The court held that public authorities are generally not liable for omissions, reaffirming the precedent set in Michael.

Davey explores the Tofaris exceptions—such as assumption of responsibility or control over the danger—but finds none applied. He argues the law is ripe for reform, noting that a simple phone call could have prevented the attack. The decision, he warns, may erode public confidence in policing and justice.

An appeal is pending, and the legal community is watching closely.

Issue: 8125 / Categories: Legal News , Tort , Criminal
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll