header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Miscarriages of justice

21 March 2025
Issue: 8109 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
211940
The proposed review of the criminal appeals process is ‘seriously impressive and broad’, but is it enough? 

NLJ columnist Jon Robins comments on the systems through which injustices are corrected, highlighting flaws and weaknesses.

In February, the Law Commission published a detailed consultation paper on potential reforms to criminal appeals. In this week’s NLJ, Robins looks at the Criminal Cases Review Commission in particular, and its relationship with the Court of Appeal.

Robins writes: ‘If the CCRC does one job well, it is deflecting attention away from the problems elsewhere, including the Court of Appeal.’ 

Issue: 8109 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll