header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: In hot water? Defending small boat pilots post-Borders Act

04 July 2025
Issue: 8123 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Criminal , National security , International
printer mail-detail
224735
Writing in NLJ this week, Aneurin Brewer of Red Lion Chambers offers a practical defence guide for small boat pilots charged under the Immigration Act 1971, as amended by the Nationality and Borders Act 2022

Brewer explains how the new offences—particularly s 24(D1) and s 25—have made it harder for asylum seekers to defend themselves, despite often being coerced into piloting. He highlights the importance of prosecutorial discretion and the potential for abuse of process arguments, especially where CPS guidance is ignored.

Brewer also explores the unusual mens rea in s 25(1)(b), arguing that genuine ignorance of the law may still offer a defence. With sentencing thresholds triggering deportation risks, many defendants are incentivised to plead to lesser charges.

Brewer’s analysis is essential reading for defence lawyers navigating this complex and politically charged area of law.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll