header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: In hot water? Defending small boat pilots post-Borders Act

04 July 2025
Issue: 8123 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Criminal , National security , International
printer mail-detail
224735
Writing in NLJ this week, Aneurin Brewer of Red Lion Chambers offers a practical defence guide for small boat pilots charged under the Immigration Act 1971, as amended by the Nationality and Borders Act 2022

Brewer explains how the new offences—particularly s 24(D1) and s 25—have made it harder for asylum seekers to defend themselves, despite often being coerced into piloting. He highlights the importance of prosecutorial discretion and the potential for abuse of process arguments, especially where CPS guidance is ignored.

Brewer also explores the unusual mens rea in s 25(1)(b), arguing that genuine ignorance of the law may still offer a defence. With sentencing thresholds triggering deportation risks, many defendants are incentivised to plead to lesser charges.

Brewer’s analysis is essential reading for defence lawyers navigating this complex and politically charged area of law.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll