header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Explanted implants—product liability’s missing evidence

226376
In this week's NLJ, Sarah Moore and Harry Wilkinson of Leigh Day spotlight the untapped evidentiary power of explanted medical devices in product liability claims

Despite their potential to reveal why devices fail and support litigation, 95% of explants—like prosthetic hips or breast implants—are discarded post-surgery. The NHS Implant Analysis Service, launched in 2022, remains underused due to confusion over ownership, consent, and clinician responsibilities.

Patients legally own their implants, yet many are unaware, and hospitals often return devices to manufacturers without consent—potentially handing key evidence to the defence.

Moore and Wilkinson argue that explants are the ‘black box’ of medical litigation, offering insights into design flaws and patient harm. They call for greater awareness among patients, clinicians, and lawyers to preserve these devices. With rising revision surgeries and NHS costs, unlocking the value of explants could transform patient safety, product design, and legal accountability.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll