header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Explanted implants—product liability’s missing evidence

226376
In this week's NLJ, Sarah Moore and Harry Wilkinson of Leigh Day spotlight the untapped evidentiary power of explanted medical devices in product liability claims

Despite their potential to reveal why devices fail and support litigation, 95% of explants—like prosthetic hips or breast implants—are discarded post-surgery. The NHS Implant Analysis Service, launched in 2022, remains underused due to confusion over ownership, consent, and clinician responsibilities.

Patients legally own their implants, yet many are unaware, and hospitals often return devices to manufacturers without consent—potentially handing key evidence to the defence.

Moore and Wilkinson argue that explants are the ‘black box’ of medical litigation, offering insights into design flaws and patient harm. They call for greater awareness among patients, clinicians, and lawyers to preserve these devices. With rising revision surgeries and NHS costs, unlocking the value of explants could transform patient safety, product design, and legal accountability.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll