header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Challenging the personal injury discount rate?

07 February 2025
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages
printer mail-detail
207250
The personal injury discount rate was increased to 0.5% in January, based for the first time on a detailed report by an expert panel. In this week’s NLJ, Julian Chamberlayne wonders whether the decision-making is vulnerable to challenge by judicial review, and uncovers a multitude of weak spots. 

Chamberlayne, partner at Stewarts and chair of the Forum of Complex Injury Solicitors, sets out his preliminary analysis. For example, assumptions made around earnings inflation and the risk profiles of assumed investment portfolios could be challenged. 

Chamberlayne writes: ‘There is no justification for not modelling the reality of de-risking investment portfolios over time.’ He notes: ‘I also question the evidence that led to the assumption that the highest value claims have the longest duration of future losses. In my experience, the vast majority of multi-million-pound injury claims involve impaired life expectancy, or are fatal accident claims with the main loss period relating to retirement age.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll