header-logo header-logo

The NLJ Column

13 April 2007 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Blogs , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The jurisprudential gold standard needs to be revisited

Following the release of the British sailors from Iran, there has been considerable interest in why the Navy personnel condemned British involvement in Iraq and made admissions of their alleged incursions into Iran’s waters. The reason the sailors gave was that they had been tortured. The details of this ‘torture’ ranged from hearing carpentry outside their cells (implicitly linked to manufacture of their coffins), being told they would never see their children again, and, terrifyingly, being told they looked like Mr Bean.

Minimum severity threshold

There are some who sympathise with the sailors when clearly a degree of intimidation forced them to appear craven on world television. But loose use of the word torture is misleading.

It is becoming very difficult to establish a finding of torture in the European court according to European Convention on Human Rights jurisprudence and the word should not be used lightly. The threshold created to filter lesser claims of human indignity, somewhat short of torture, known as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll