header-logo header-logo

The NLJ column

18 January 2007 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Why do we allow revenge and neglect to play such major roles in our justice systems?

There can be no more emotive a crime than the murder of a child by its mother. Such a notion must strike at the very foundations of society.
The essence of society’s condemnation of murder, and the strict approach taken by the law to its commission is that it is the murderer’s explicit intention that the victim should die, or at least suffer really serious harm. The consequent sentence of mandatory life imprisonment follows on from this basic principle; it is driven, not so much by legal logic, but by the public demand for retribution.

A different kind of murder?

All this is well and good when one is dealing with the heinous actions of cold-blooded murder, born of anger, revenge or pure evil. But in almost all the cases of mothers killing their children, none of these reprehensible criteria exists. It is time to recognise that these mothers are probably not murderers and should not face the mandatory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll