header-logo header-logo

Nightingale courts or remote juries?

14 April 2021
Issue: 7928 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have called for more Nightingale courts and judicial sitting days to tackle the backlog of cases and urged caution on plans for remote jury trials.

Ministers are considering legislation to give criminal courts more discretionary powers to use live links, after the Coronavirus Act 2020 expires next March. According to the impact assessment document for the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, this could ‘make it possible in the future, for example, for a jury, sitting collectively, to participate in a trial by “live video link” where the court considered this appropriate. Remote participation by a jury would only be considered at the discretion of the trial judge where there is good and sufficient reason to operate in this way’.

In Scotland, remote jury trials have been taking place since September 2020 with jurors watching proceedings from socially distanced seats in a cinema.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘There would need to be clear evidence of how juries sitting remotely will help to increase capacity to clear the backlogs before such a change is considered.

‘Additionally, more work needs to be done to fully understand the impact remote hearings have on justice outcomes, as the Ministry of Justice and HM Courts and Tribunals Service have acknowledged. Juries being able to sit remotely would also be reliant on the widespread availability of high-quality and extremely reliable technology.

‘Maximising existing court capacity and judicial sitting days and boosting capacity through many more Nightingale courts is the best way of increasing the amount of jury trials that can take place safely.’

Criminal Bar Association chair James Mulholland QC, in this week’s Monday Message for members, said: ‘The focus for the next few months must continue to be the relentless pursuit of more court space for more in person jury trials. It is as simple as that.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll