header-logo header-logo

Nightingale courts: challenges, dangers & ethics

03 September 2021 / David Langwallner
Issue: 7946 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
56074
Law in the hotel lobby: David Langwallner examines the dilemmas arising from the relocation of trials to temporary courtrooms

A nightingale is a rural migratory Songbird known for the quality of its voice, less in evidence in the UK as bird stocks decline. The government established Nightingale courts last year—presumably in recognition of Florence Nightingale and her work during the Crimean War, rather than dulcet-toned barristers.

In Richard Cavendish’s monograph ‘The Crimean War’ (History Today, Volume 54 Issue, 3 March 2004) he argues that the war displayed great confusions of purpose and motivations, and in a remark curiously prescient to our time: ‘never did such incompetence led to so much social butchery’. It lasted two years, five months and 14 days with over half a million dead. The coronavirus began in Wuhan in December 2019.

Blurred lines

The Nightingales formed part of government plans to ensure courts could recover from the coronavirus pandemic as soon as possible and (with emphasis added from the government website)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll