header-logo header-logo

13 August 2013
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New referral fee rules

Conveyancers not subject to outright ban

Licensed conveyancers will not be subjected to an outright ban on referral fees, but must comply with new transparency conditions.

The Legal Services Board (LSB) last week granted an application by the Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) to alter the rules on referral fees in conveyancing.

The CLC identified the biggest threat to consumers as the level of information given to them about referral fees, and the timing of that information, in a review and consultation exercise carried out earlier this year. It has now altered its Disclosure of Profits and Advantages Code. 

Conveyancers have three months to comply with the new arrangements, which provide that: agreements with third-party referrers should be in writing and subject to periodic review; clients should be informed in writing of the arrangement’s existence no later than when accepting instructions, or when introducing a client to another person; clients should be advised they have a choice of provider; and the client should be informed of the nature of the arrangement, including any payment made, with whom it is made, and any impact, including any legal costs they are charged.

Anna Bradley, CLC chair, said: “Our review of referral fees in conveyancing found no evidence of consumer detriment—an assessment shared by the LSB and Legal Services Consumer Panel following their own past research.” 

In 2011, The LSB published a report on referral fees in the conveyancing, personal injury and criminal advocacy markets. In April 2013, referral fees were banned for personal injury cases.

Issue: 7573 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll