header-logo header-logo

New orders seek protection for abuse victims

15 March 2018
Issue: 7785 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Domestic abuse perpetrators could be electronically tagged or forced to attend programmes to address their attitudes under new Domestic Abuse Protection Orders.

Breaching an order would be a criminal offence. Where abuse involves or affects a child, this would be counted as an aggravating factor during sentencing. A Domestic Abuse Commissioner would be appointed to hold the government to account.

These and other proposals were published last week in the consultation, Transforming the Response to Domestic Abuse, ahead of a draft Domestic Abuse Bill.

For the first time, economic abuse is recognised as a type of domestic abuse, protecting victims whose finances are withheld, or who are denied access to employment or transport.

It offers a new statutory definition of domestic abuse as ‘any incident or pattern of incidents of controlling, coercive, threatening behaviour, violence or abuse…’.

‘Controlling behaviour’ is defined as ‘a range of acts designed to make a person subordinate and/or dependent by isolating them from sources of support, exploiting their resources and capacities for personal gain, depriving them of the means needed for independence, resistance and escape and regulating their everyday behaviour’.

Family law solicitor-advocate and NLJ columnist David Burrows said: ‘It concentrates on: promoting awareness of domestic abuse; the issue of protection and support of victims; and how to “pursue and deter” perpetrators.

‘A lawyer will be concerned with the third: police response and improving the experience of the justice system of “victims” (they are not “victims”; nothing is proved yet); and with what the Ministry of Justice makes of it all in the current review of legal aid.’

Views are sought by 31 May 2018.

Issue: 7785 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll