header-logo header-logo

10 May 2013 / Jon Holbrook
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A new morality

Jon Holbrook pays tribute to the late Ronald Dworkin

Like all profound thinkers Professor Ronald Dworkin, who died in February, asked a big question and answered it by challenging a prevailing orthodoxy. To the question “what is the theoretical basis for law?” Dworkin locked horns with legal positivism or, as he described it, the ruling theory of his day. Legal positivism reached its apogee with HLA Hart’s arguments in The Concept of Law, published in 1961. To Professor Hart and other legal positivists law was about systems of rule making and structures of governance. Judges decided cases by applying previous judicial decisions and by drawing, where necessary, on the social standards and customs of the day. By studying these systems and structures the law could be discovered: the law was what had been posited.

Legal positivism

The impact of legal positivism can readily be seen in the conservative evolution of the British common law. Despite his flamboyance, Lord Denning, whose judicial career spanned from 1944 to 1982, practised legal positivism. Denning, often referred

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll