header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Legal News , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

New money laundering rules will threaten business

News

Half of UK law firms believe the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 will undermine the competitiveness of the UK economy, a new survey shows.
The research by LexisNexis also shows that 52% of law firms believe the new regulations—due to come into force in December—will require additional financial investment and of these, half claim their overall due diligence costs will increase by 10% to 29%. 

Under the new regulations, details of which were released by the government last week, law firms will need to make major changes to how they undertake customer due diligence, in particular, how firms conduct money laundering checks, identify beneficial owners, and perform ongoing monitoring of business relationships.

Although 40% of law firms see no benefits to the new regulations, 68% have started to invest in training resources and 48% have started to invest in personnel to perform due diligence checks.

The regulations will extend supervision to all businesses in the regulated sector to secure greater compliance with anti-money laundering controls and introduce strict tests to ensure money services business, and firms that help set up and manage trusts and companies, are not run for criminal purposes. They will also require extra checks on customers that pose a higher risk of money laundering.

The government says regulatory burdens will be reduced in low risk areas. Firms can make fewer checks in some situations, such as occupational pension funds, while the number of identity checks will be reduced, with firms being able to rely upon checks done by certain other firms, eg solicitors. Greater flexibility will be introduced to record keeping rules so firms can keep only the important details rather than whole documents.

Mark Dunn, head of risk and compliance at LexisNexis, says: “The regulatory authorities are likely to clamp down hard on law firms that do not adhere to the new regulations so companies need to make sure that they don’t run the risk of being penalised.”

Issue: 7284 / Categories: Legal News , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll