header-logo header-logo

New code issued for driverless cars

02 October 2015
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A new code for driverless cars being tested in public places has been issued.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Lucy McCormick, barrister at Henderson Chambers, says failure to adhere to the new code could be relevant in any subsequent liability proceedings. Three trials of driverless cars, or “autonomous vehicles”, are either currently or soon to be taking place.

Key ingredients of the code include the presence of a “driver”, the existence of a “black box” and effective safeguards against hacking.

McCormick notes that legislative quirks have given the UK a “significant head start in becoming the test bed of an industry that is anticipated to be worth £900bn a year globally by 2025”.

She writes that the government is seeking to build on this by amending domestic regulations by summer 2017 to accommodate further developments in driverless technology

Issue: 7670 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll